On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 aluger@hushmail.com wrote:

At Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:52:46 -0500 (CDT), "J.A. Terranson" <measl@mfn.org> wrote:

...

On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Anonymous wrote:

You may invoke the 5th for *any* question that *may* tend to incriminate you, in *any* way. Certainly these hypotheticals apply. What scares me is the use of "involuntary immunizations" by persecuters to get around the invocation...

Uh... no.

No *what*? "No", you may not invoke the 5th for any reason, subject only to your own opinion as to what may constitute "incriminating"? Or, "No", you can't be involuntarily immunized? Or, "No", you haven't a clue what we're talking about?

And you got your law degree WHERE?

Ad hominem? This will certainly "prove your points", won't it? -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place... --------------------------------------------------------------------