RE: Capitalism and economic struggles
I actually don't impose my ideals.
Not any more than I do, that may be so. I wasn't the one to utter"
What part of "Don't impose your ideals on others" do you not understand? Did I ask for laws ? I didn't. But that's besides the point, is it ?
I do however urge others to accept and adopt them. Point in case, you have assumed that I smoke. I actually don't, and never have
I have a nasty habit to indiscriminately say "you" instead of "one", and, hmm, "the Americans" when I mean "part of the US govt". Seen from here, anyway. I just can't get the habit out, and it's generalization that hinders discussion. But I'm very aware of it.
I'm not imposing, I'm asking. I don't have a law book to thump, nor a gun to point at you, nor a cop waiting to arrest you if you disagree with what I say. Nor am I asking for such laws to prevent or limit others in similar ways.
I'm undecided. I was thinking this exact same thing some 15 or 20 years ago. I was really in that Libertarian way of thinking. It makes some kind of superficial sense, and I've still got ties to a lot of that thinking. But I now am of the opinion that if you (someone, not you particularly) do something that affects me, this person actually is imposing something. Not at gunpoint, not with the threat of force, litigation, jail time, whatever. But imposing nonetheless. I'm aware of the difference of scale, and the lack of a formidable power of coercion from an individual compared to a state. My point is other, however, that yours. You say the state should not decide what is and is not allowed. I say that, while the state may indeed not, it still leaves an unresolved problem, which it is futile to dismiss with a wave of "personal freedom", because it doesn't only involve, in this particular case, the smoker. However, I'm torn by the parallel with, say, free speech. Speech can affect others, as well as smoke, or anything else, can. If you impose it, or oppose part of it, where does it stop ? I don't have a solution to that, apart from case by case analysis. But saying "I can do what I want even if affects others, short of murder/rape/theft/etc", no, I don't see that as a solution. -- Vincent Penquerc'h
participants (1)
-
Vincent Penquerc'h