RE: Most of a nation on probation? (GPS convicts)

Hey Lyn, I know, I know.... actually, I'm a baby privacy, surveillance law/policy and investigative law lawyer. I'm still in my first few years of practice, so I haven't advertised an area yet. (Choosing a practice area is a gut-wrenching decision, nailing yourself to it is even more difficult.) So, yeah...I hear how sucky the bumper beepers are. BUT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ARE WE TO LET CPUNKS KNOW ABOUT MY PRACTICE INTERESTS, or I will get covered up in crazies. Raytheon, whatever... *laughter* ~Aimee Lyn Kennedy wrote:
And as usual, this was written by some PR flack without a clue. GPS needs at least three satellites visible to determine location (not "a" sat). Also it doesn't work inside most houses. The frequencies used are even attenuated by trees. Much more by wood, bricks, etc. Even though there might be some advantages, it's mostly a way to rip off the taxpayers for more money.
BTW, one of your notes said you are in Waco. What kind of law do you practice? Should I keep your number handy in case I get arrested for watching planes at TSTC airport while munching my Whopper? Or do you work for Raytheon?
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 73, E-mail | lrkn@anet-dfw.com | | Lyn Kennedy webpage | http://webusers.anet-dfw.com/~lrkn/ | | K5QWB pony express = P.O. Box 5133, Ovilla, TX, USA 75154 | ---Livin' on an information dirt road a few miles off the superhighway---

Whoops. :)

At 07:34 PM 7/12/01 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
Hey Lyn,
I know, I know.... actually, I'm a baby privacy, surveillance law/policy and investigative law lawyer.
My kid is 21 months old. Would you still take him on as a baby privacy client? He's getting concerned about the number of baby pictures I've put up on the web, and was talking about getting a lawyer. He'd probably have to pursue a judgement, not just a restraining order, against me in order to pay you. Are you licenced in Calif? :-)

*laughter* You're a 'baby lawyer' for about 10-15 years. It's a permanent "state of being" if you are the offspring of a lawyer. :) ~Aimee David wrote:
My kid is 21 months old. Would you still take him on as a baby privacy client? He's getting concerned about the number of baby pictures I've put up on the web, and was talking about getting a lawyer. He'd probably have to pursue a judgement, not just a restraining order, against me in order to pay you. Are you licenced in Calif?
:-)
participants (2)
-
Aimee Farr
-
David Honig