FBI not as incompetent as recent reports say
Wen Ho Lee, Robert Hanssen, screwed-up lab tests, failure to detect Aldrich Ames, missing handguns, Waco, Ruby Ridge...the portrait of a dysfunctional agency, right? Far from it, from what I can see. Some of the examples are marginally silly, some are due to pressures from bureaucrats, some are things which virtually no organization on earth could have detected. I'm not a particular friend of the FBI, as the Seattle and Portland offices will probably acknowledge, but I seen no particular _decline_ in quality such as the article Matt Gaylor posted suggests. The spotlight is much brighter today, there are many more reporting outlets. And the Net magnifies conspiracy theories. (I believe Waco was mishandled badly--the preacher should have just been picked up by the local Sheriff or arrested on one of his many trips into town or walks along his fence. And I believe Ruby Ridge was an example of a barricade situation which didn' t need to happen. The "crime" of selling a long gun with a barrel one quarter of an inch too short was both a "set up" (to induce cooperation by Randy Weaver) and shouldn't have been a crime in the first place. These are mistakes, not evidence of a Bureau that has become incompetent or malevolent.) The Wen Ho Lee case is much more mysterious. Maybe he _was_ a Chinese spy...certainly China is an emerging superpower with the willingness to recruit spies. We do it, the Russians do it, the French and Germans do it, why not the Chinese? What about missing weapons? Well, large organizations lose all kinds of things. Including guns. Big deal. Hanssen? The Sovs knew that recruiting agents within the FBI's counter-spy division was the equivalent of recruiting agents at Los Alamos in the 1940s. Did the FBI miss some warning signs? Probably. Did Jim Bamford miss some warning signs? Yep. (Bamford was a friend of Hanssen's.) How about the bad lab results? Sure. Shit happens. But, all in all, I see no particular evidence that the FBI is in a state of moral or professional collapse. I think I'd rather have been working for Louis Freeh these past 10 years than a weirdo like J. Edgar Hoover and his queen Tolson. (I had and still have profound disagreement with Freeh and Jim Kellstrom (spelling? I used to know his name, but it escapes me right now) over things like Clipper, key escrow, and no knock raids, but I thought they were competent, professional, and intelligent adversaries. They never knew who I was, obviously, but we were in the same competency league. In my opinion, of course.) Thinking of the FBI as Keystone Kops is dangerous, which is why I am writing this note. --Tim May -- Timothy C. May tcmay@got.net Corralitos, California Political: Co-founder Cypherpunks/crypto anarchy/Cyphernomicon Technical: physics/soft errors/Smalltalk/Squeak/agents/games/Go Personal: b.1951/UCSB/Intel '74-'86/retired/investor/motorcycles/guns
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:40:34PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
(I had and still have profound disagreement with Freeh and Jim Kellstrom (spelling? I used to know his name, but it escapes me right now) over things like Clipper, key escrow, and no knock raids, but I
Kallstrom, former head of the NYC office, now well-employed in the private sector. -Declan
A broader point can be made as well. The Lee-Hanssen-labtest ancedotes are just that. They may be important, but ancedotes do not by themselves provide evidence of a trend. To really evaluate the FBI, we'd need data like # of prosecutions, # of prosecutions thrown out of court because of bad evidence, # of employees, # of spies caught, and even more detailed info that would be tricky to collect. TRAC does a reasonable job.
But, all in all, I see no particular evidence that the FBI is in a state of moral or professional collapse. I think I'd rather have been working for
Right. They seem pretty much what they were a decade ago, when I first moved to DC. And even though they may still lack clue, they're nevertheless a lot smarter about computer "crimes" and what happens online. FLETC courses, training manuals, Defcon presentations, etc. -Declan
participants (2)
-
Declan McCullagh
-
Tim May