At 09:41 PM 1/7/2002 +0100, Eugene Leitl wrote:

-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBMTO: N48 04'14.8'' E11 36'41.2'' http://www.leitl.org 57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 11:15:48 -0800 From: Hack Hawk <hh@hackhawk.net> To: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>, Eugene Leitl <Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>, cryptography@wasabisystems.com Cc: Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>, dcsb@ai.mit.edu Subject: Re: Hackers Targeting Home Computers

Although I originally used the word filter to describe a possible ISP action to address certain problems, the following statement from KB was more what I meant to suggest. And also Lynn Wheeler's statement about Dynamic IP addresses not being allowed to host HTTP services because it's not in the consumer/client agreement anyway.

Of course these agreements are very much fluid. Can't host a web site (at least using std port nos.) but P2P's OK because its a driver of consumer interest in broadband. steve