Close, but no cigar. 64.164.25.91 != 64.164.156.82, but both are PacBell DSL static IP addresses. 64.164.156.82 used to belong to the corporate DSL line going into my office building. Not long ago, the DSL service was upgraded and was assigned a new IP address, and about the same time, we set up a mail server attached to the DSL line and I got a new mail address on the new domain. Jonathan Wienke -----Original Message----- From: Brian Lane [mailto:brian@nexuscomputing.com] Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 9:57 PM To: montag montag Cc: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net Subject: Re: throw-away acct test On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 01:18:11PM -0800, montag montag wrote:

testing ... testing .... CHECK !

It works.

Not too useful when Yahoo records your IP address. Received: from [64.164.25.91] by web11403.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 +13:18:11 PST Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:18:11 -0800 (PST) From: montag montag <cels451@yahoo.com> Subject: throw-away acct test And when there are only a couple of regular posters using similar connections to adsl-64-164-25-91.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net I'd guess that there is a moderate probability of you being "Jonathan Wienke" <mis@itiaccess.com> - JonathanW (adsl-64-164-156-82.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.164.156.82]) from a couple of recent postings. Of course this is all rampant speculation on my part. Brian -- Brian C. Lane - Linux Programmer/Consultant/Writer www.brianlane.com Virtual Web Hosting www.nexuscomputing.com NRA Life Member www.libertynews.org ============================================================================ 911 -- government sponsored Dial-a-Prayer.