A nice little dose of pop conspiracy theory...
Actually, despite some of the fairly dubious "what about this!" points, there are some things that are a little unsettling. No way that's a Boeing 757, and it's not like they can just lose one (ie, there should have been one unaccounted for). And I was unaware of the possibility that the FBI had quickly confiscated tapes that would show the 'plane' more clearly. So for what it's worth... http://pixla.px.cz/pentagon.swf -TD _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 10:34, Tyler Durden wrote:
Actually, despite some of the fairly dubious "what about this!" points, there are some things that are a little unsettling. No way that's a Boeing 757, and it's not like they can just lose one (ie, there should have been one unaccounted for). And I was unaware of the possibility that the FBI had quickly confiscated tapes that would show the 'plane' more clearly.
So for what it's worth...
Interesting stuff. The plane in the Pentagon camera shots is definitely no 757. Question is, where did the flight 77 equipment (the 757 that supposedly crashed into the Pentagon) finally end up? -- Roy M. Silvernail is roy@rant-central.com, and you're not "Progress, like reality, is not optional." - R. A. Hettinga SpamAssassin->procmail->/dev/null->bliss http://www.rant-central.com
Tyler Durden <camera_lumina@hotmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps some of those arguments can be put to bed: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2004/110804factsstraight.htm ...not that I find either one completely convincing... -- Riad S. Wahby rsw@jfet.org
participants (3)
-
Riad S. Wahby -
Roy M. Silvernail -
Tyler Durden