Re: PHRACK: Article from PHRACK 42 on encryption
Exposing factual errors and flaws in reasoning is left as an exercise for the reader.
The flaws are big enough to drive a bakery truck through. Its trash.
maybe you should do a better writeup and publish it in PHRACK or 2600?
I agree. Anyone can sit and say "Oh, that article is a piece of crap", but these same people never put their "money where their mouth is" and write an article of their own. I've written for both Phrack and 2600 and it sure as hell isn't hard to get something submitted. If you think you can do better by all means write an article and send it in. If trash is being published, why not try to correct it? If you have any problems with where to send it, I'll gladly forward you the address. Otherwise, shut the hell up. If you don't like your goverment, vote. If you don't like something that is published, write something yourself. It's not some type of elite club of writers, both publications welcome people of all walks to submit. --Doug --- Douglas Mason douglas@approach.com Network Administration CompuServe: 76646,3367 Approach Software Corporation +01 415.306.7890
participants (1)
-
Douglas Mason