-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 on Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 01:24:44PM -0700, Meyer Wolfsheim (wolf@priori.net) wrote: <...>

For the most part, Mutt is an excellent email client. However, I'm actually going to correct myself, and say that it *is* Mutt that doesn't play well with others in this case. I have no problem with Mutt favoring RFC 2015/3156 for PGP handling. As someone else recently pointed out on one of the GnuPG lists, the flaw is in Mutt's inability to do normal PGP messages.

What's "normal" PGP messages? There is an option to clearsign by default. I've elected not to do this. Peace. - -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7skPmOEeIn1XyubARAg7WAJ9/iuaFoqSYcKjmp5SagNADWYx2EwCeJty9 abqIir0y+FgzH56WyAcjRww= =l8hU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----