At 07:53 AM 9/10/04 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:

<http://www.techcentralstation.com/090904A.html>

Is it possible for one to be libertarian about policies at home and neo-conservative about policies abroad? After all, isn't the principle of non-coercion incompatible with the interventionist policies of the current Administration? Simply put: is there such an animal as a libertarian hawk and if he exists, why do we so seldom hear from him?

On the contrary, the Ayn Rand institute has been taken over by vocal Zionists. They would never bomb Dimona but if a non-israeli semite even thinks about uranium, its missiles away. Or if the South Koreans do a bit of clandestine enrichment, no big deal, they're "our" *friends*. ----- "Stop shedding our blood to save your own and the solution to this simple but complex equation is in your hands. You know matters will escalate the more you delay and then do not blame us but blame yourselves. Rational people do not risk their security, money and sons to appease the White House liar." UBL The only language the American people understand is dead Americans. -EC