I was listening to an ITC podcast with Ed Amoroso, security wonk at AT&T, who tried his best to make content filtering by the carriers sound like a good thing. http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail965.html I found myself shaking my head in wonderment an awful lot as I was listening to this... --Bob. This is what Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org> said about "[dewayne@warpspeed.com: [Dewayne-Ne" on 2 Feb 2006 at 15:28

----- Forwarded message from Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@warpspeed.com> -----

From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@warpspeed.com> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:10:13 -0800 To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <dewayne-net@warpspeed.com> Subject: [Dewayne-Net] THE END OF THE INTERNET? X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Reply-To: dewayne@warpspeed.com

[Note: Worth reading. Also, check out some of the white papers the article points to. One of note: "Network Neutrality: A Broadband Wild West?". DLH]

THE END OF THE INTERNET? [SOURCE: The Nation, AUTHOR: Jeff Chester]

[Commentary] Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies that would track and store information on our every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency. According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest pockets--corporations, special-interest groups and major advertisers -- would get preferred treatment. Content from these providers would have first priority on our computer and television screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out. Under the plans they are considering, all of us--from content providers to individual users -- would pay more to surf online, stream videos or even send e-mail. Industry planners are mulling new subscription plans that would further limit the online experience, establishing "platinum," "gold" and "silver" levels of Internet access that would set limits on the number of downloads, media streams or even e-mail messages that could be sent or received. To make this pay-to-play vision a reality, phone and cable lobbyists are now engaged in a political campaign to further weaken the nation's communications policy laws. They want the federal government to permit them to operate Internet and other digital communications services as private networks, free of policy safeguards or governmental oversight. Indeed, both the Congress and the Federal Communications Commission are considering proposals that will have far-reaching impact on the Internet's future. Ten years after passage of the ill-advised Telecommunications Act of 1996, telephone and cable companies are using the same political snake oil to convince compromised or clueless lawmakers to subvert the Internet into a turbo-charged digital retail machine.

<http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060213/chester>

Links to White Papers mentioned above: <http:// www.democraticmedia.org/issues/netneutrality.html>

Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com>

----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE