Obviously, if someone who uses company assets for personal business deserves all the snooping he gets, at least theoretically, though certainly not in actual practice. The tweak in the British RIP vs. Eurocrat case here is that, same as it ever was, the nation-state is again quite literally expropriating the resources of employers by making them subject to a human "right". ;-). "The 'Poor'?? Are there no prisons?" Cheers, RAH (Who believes we'll *all* be proprietors some day, and none of this garbage will matter anymore...) --- begin forwarded text