* Reply to msg originally in CYPHERPUNKS Uu> Q1: What cypherpunk remailers exist? Uu> 1: nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu Uu> 2: hh@cicada.berkeley.edu Uu> 3: hh@pmantis.berkeley.edu Uu> 4: hh@soda.berkeley.edu Uu> 5: 00x@uclink.berkeley.edu Uu> 6: hal@alumni.caltech.edu Uu> 7: ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu Uu> 8: remailer@rebma.mn.org Uu> 9: elee7h5@rosebud.ee.uh.edu Uu> 10: hfinney@shell.portal.com Uu> 11: remail@tamsun.tamu.edu Uu> 12: remail@tamaix.tamu.edu Uu> 13: remailer@utter.dis.org Uu> 14: remailer@entropy.linet.org Uu> 15: remail@extropia.wimsey.com OK. It seems that remail@extropia.wimsey.com (#15) is down. This is a shame, as it was the _only_ remailer that would function as an anonymous remailer for me. It worked beautifully while it was up. Its apparent demise has been reported by other users as well, . Several of the remailers listed (2,3,4,5) have _never_ worked using standard cypherpunks syntax: :: Request-Remailing-To: . All other cypherpunks remailers, reliable or not, retain the footer addresses automagically inserted by the host box here & are therefore not in any way anonymous for my purposes. There was a discussion of a "cut line" syntax before I temporarily lost access to cypherpunks, but as far as I know there was never any agreement or implementation (I shall be pleased to be corrected if this is not the case). . Penet.fi will no longer work for me since the forced-password implementation due to an apparent header conflict with the X-Anon-Password: line & local host/gate software. . Why am I depressed? . ~ . M. ********************************************************************* * <m..stirner@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org> - PGP Key D30909 via servers * * > What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not <* * > warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit <* * > of resistance? Let them take arms!" - Thomas Jefferson, 1787 <* ********************************************************************* ... Organization: Concerned Norwegians Against Lutefisk, S.F., CA ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 -- M. Stirner - via FidoNet node 1:125/1 UUCP: ...!uunet!kumr!shelter!28!M..Stirner INTERNET: M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG
As usual: repl: bad addresses: "M. Stirner" <M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org> -- no mailbox in local-part (.)
. Penet.fi will no longer work for me since the forced-password implementation due to an apparent header conflict with the X-Anon-Password: line & local host/gate software.
No, no, no! Sigh! Once again: You *don't* have to put the X-Anon-Password line in among the headers, it's OK as the first non-empty line *in the message body*.
. Why am I depressed?
Because you use a screwed-up mail system/gateway? Because you give up too easily?
... Organization: Concerned Norwegians Against Lutefisk, S.F., CA
Oh? *This* might be the real reason for your depression. I sympatize. Lutefisk gets me, too! Julf
participants (2)
-
Johan Helsingius -
M..Stirner＠f28.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG