RE: Is minder.net really screwed up?
Thanks for the explanations. I deliberately picked minder over lne because I don't support filtering by anyone but the final recipient. Peter Trei
---------- From: Brian Minder[SMTP:bmm@minder.net] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:05 PM To: Eric Murray Cc: Trei, Peter; 'cypherpunks@lne.com' Subject: Re: Is minder.net really screwed up?
Sircam is indeed the culprit. minder.net usually delivers from 10^5 to 10^6 messages a day. Since this latest worm the average has risen by an order of magnitude, though things have slowed down quite a bit in the last 24 hours. We're working though the backlog.
As some of the mail I deliver is for paying, privacy oriented customers I'm obliged not to peek or filter to mitigate the situation as Eric has done.
Thanks,
-Brian
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Eric Murray wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:47:03AM -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
When cyberpass started messing up a few weeks ago, I unsubbed there and resubbed at minder.net
Several times, I've noticed that messages I sent were replied to long before I ever saw the original message come back.
Yesterday I sent a message around 11AM, and just got the original back, over 24 hours later.
[...]
participants (1)
-
Trei, Peter