Date: Wed, 3 Mar 93 12:41:48 -0500 From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@Athena.MIT.EDU> Subject: Re: You Aren't [I'm Not] ... I don't believe in prior restraint; but I do believe in personal responsibility ... ... in this model, how can you provide personal responsibility? ted, when you say you favor personal responsibility, do you mean "i am in favor of people acting responsibly," which i take to be the sense of the first quote, or do you mean "i want there to be a way to hold people responsible for their actions," which i take to be the meaning of the second? (i favor the former, but am undecided about the latter. not that anyone asked ...) peter ps: pardon my wild excerpting; i hope it doesn't obscure.
From: Peter Honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 93 21:22:27 EST ... I don't believe in prior restraint; but I do believe in personal responsibility ... ... in this model, how can you provide personal responsibility? ted, when you say you favor personal responsibility, do you mean "i am in favor of people acting responsibly," which i take to be the sense of the first quote, or do you mean "i want there to be a way to hold people responsible for their actions," which i take to be the meaning of the second? Yes, I mean the second interpretation; what generally tends to happen is that without the second, generally the first deteriorates over time. And "holding somone responsible for their actions" doesn't necessarilly mean throwing someone in jail, or sueing them for lots of money --- it can be as simple as their knowing that what they say can be traced back to them, and their own personal credibility is on the line. (As opposed to some pseudonym's credibility, which can always be discarded and a new one requested.) - Ted
participants (2)
-
Peter Honeyman
-
Theodore Ts'o