On 6/21/06, coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:

... physical security is a necessary element of trust... http://public.peertech.org/tmp/tapd-01.jpg

[AnonymousHeckler] Silly punk, they don't send a van for a sneak and peak. it's hard to sneak when you've got remote surveillance of the perimeter. unfortunately hiding in plain sight didn't work too well either. (of course i'll never know the details, which is part of the point. FOIPA has been neutered; though another try can't hurt...) visible cams are cheap and easy (my recent favorite: "Cams from the TPB bust" http://youtube.com/watch?v=30HF-m_I6yY ) and i like the deterrent they provide. wireless makes a good backup path (in addition to primary broadband) for critical signalling and remote feed archival; recording locally doesn't make much sense, right? :) rcovert and wifitap style wireless transport is a great secondary path with an amplified injector (unidirectional). i'd love to try this at 1Mbps encoding on 700mW 900Mhz (SR9 radio) but the 2.4Ghz works well enough at 30dBm. don't forget those UPS's... [i dream of a day the 802.11 MAC is dead. flawed assumptions at the base of this stack leads to vulnerability up transport/session/application layers too. cognitive software radios++] regarding critical signalling: always fail safe to zeroisation upon DoS or detection. good key management means a false positive is easy to recovery from. concealed/covert cameras would be fun but difficult. anyone have suggestions / experience? regards, coderman - with a significantly lower B.A.C. today...