Re: [s-t] needle in haystack digest #3 (fwd from Nick.Barnes@pobox.com)
6 Nov
2003
6 Nov
'03
5:17 p.m.
At 06:00 PM 11/6/03 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I guess I didn't make myself clear. I wasn't hypothesizing an attack against a fab. I was saying that
The focus on Thomspon-trojaned tools and Chipworks-style reverse engineering is silly. There are plenty of folks who need green cards, or whose relatives do, who have modify access to the CVS of the RTL for a chip. That is the best way to add unauthorized "features" --through a technically competent insider. Since the features are not in the spec, they won't be tested for. Sure, you might have to do some work after the chips are fielded --getting the trojaned system to process a certain string, wiretapping its response-- but the payoff can be huge.
7675
Age (days ago)
7675
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Major Variola (ret)