Re: News: "U.S. May Help Chinese Evade Net Censorship"
-- On 30 Aug 2001, at 14:41, Faustine wrote:
Of course it has a trap door, that's probably the whole point of getting it over there in the first place. And by the way, if you're going to question SafeWeb for cooperating with CIA, you might as well criticize ZeroKnowledge for selling a boatload of the Freedom beta to the NSA in 1999 as well. What did they think they wanted it for, farting around on Usenet? I bet they had that sucker reverse-engineered and compromised in two minutes flat. Stands to reason.
I think it most unlikely that they could compromise rot-13 in two minutes flat, and as for reverse engineering, any decent crypto system makes its engineering publicly available, so that reverse engineering is quite unnecessary. No one should ever use a system that has to be reverse engineered. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG vmwKl1+31thMlrC2hl4XzwiD6EPSMqrBX8OqN5J0 4qFXhFjCIcqlGNHPzxbUC4Kfz95pkdg5H60E8+j1v
At 09:47 AM 8/31/01 -0700, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
I think it most unlikely that they could compromise rot-13 in two minutes flat,
They've probably automated a full cryptanalysis of any cipher available up to 1950, so rot-13 is covered :-) No one should ever use
a system that has to be reverse engineered.
Nice, if subtle, quote.
participants (2)
-
David Honig
-
jamesd@echeque.com