CDR: RE: Connie Chung fucks up & things are not as they seem.A good ex ample of the tremen
Seeing as the rest of this site is talking about crop circles and UFOs, I think I can ignore this report. Peter Trei [While it's not impossible for UFO-nuts to stumble across something real, their inability to distinguish reality from fantasy indicates a lack of critical faculty. In a world where the flow of claim and counterclaim has an intensity not unlike standing underneath a waterfall, filtering is essential. This claim fails one of my first level filters. PT]
---------- From: Gary Jeffers[SMTP:jeffersgary@hotmail.com] Reply To: Gary Jeffers Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 1:42 AM To: declan@well.com Cc: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net Subject: Re: Connie Chung fucks up & things are not as they seem.A good example of the tremen
Declan McCullagh writes:
Source? TV show? Date? Transcript?
-Declan
Declan, my source is the net address listed below. At the top of that page are a "general info" button and a "contact us" button. Under "general info" they list info@iraap.org as their email address. They also list there their snail mail address.
That's all I know of the source. This looks like a job for an investgative reporter such as yourself:-) Sorry I am not more helpful. If you can actually validate from tv network sources that that sequel occurred, you will have a great big can of worms to play with :-) -Good luck!
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 10:20:10PM -0600, Gary Jeffers wrote:
My fellow Cypherpunks, The following is interesting.
http://www.albany.net/~rwcecot/iraap/Quinn/phoenix1.htm
find string: Connie Chung
A good example of the tremendous degree to which the major news media organizations are called to heel is seen in the facts surrounding the two year hiatus in the professional career of CBS broadcaster Connie
Chung,
who
had the misfortune to have ended up being paired with Dan Rather several years ago.
"Trei, Peter" wrote:
Seeing as the rest of this site is talking about crop circles and UFOs, I think I can ignore this report.
five minutes search on google turn up no "2 year hibernation" in her resume. while it appears that she wasn't very active 1995-1997, that appears to have been because she was pursuing opportunities outside the primetime TV business. and she was definitely not inactive in 1997/1998 since she got a few rewards for her work during that period. something like a date "she vanished from X to Y" would greatly raise the believability value of this story.
participants (2)
-
Tom Vogt
-
Trei, Peter