Sorry to bother the audience with purely crypto issues, I just wonder if anyone else evaluated this Ferguson's paper on apparent simplicity and therefore insecurity of Rijndael: http://www.xs4all.nl/~vorpal/pubs/rdalgeq.html BTW, where are the archives to that crypto-coding list (whatever the name was) ? ===== end (of original message) Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this) spam follows: Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Sorry to bother the audience with purely crypto issues, I just wonder if anyone else evaluated this Ferguson's paper on apparent simplicity and
-- On 16 Aug 2001, at 13:17, Morlock Elloi wrote: therefore
insecurity of Rijndael:
"and therefore insecurity" Does not follow. I would argue that rather the simpler, the stronger. A simple structure, if it can be broken, would have simple breaks. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG S1hKxB2ZdiFQfFn/0TRow7KAF/Yu/430mi64oJi/ 4ThCd/XGQLmoLjr/QPNOba1CIvb3yflWK2CXzPoZz
participants (2)
-
jamesd＠echeque.com -
Morlock Elloi