Uu> Maybe all penet users on the list should activate passwords on Uu> penet.fi. Penet may search back along the chain of addresses for any Uu> familiar address to check against it's list of password-enabled Uu> addresses. Something is way screwy with Penet lately. I have found that I have had passwords required when I had no recollection of installing them. On top of this, I am unable to use the password provision due to header grunging at the UUCP gate, in any case. . I have requested to admin@anon.penet.fi that the accounts by number be deleted in order that I can start over with fresh accounts, & despite three requests, this has not been done. Bloody annoying, but I suppose when we give Julf a big raise, _then_ I can start bitching, huh? 8-) . Speaking of related remailers, what is the status of Charcoal? ********************************************************************* * <m..stirner@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org> - PGP Key D30909 via servers * * > What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not <* * > warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit <* * > of resistance? Let them take arms!" - Thomas Jefferson, 1787 <* ********************************************************************* ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 -- M. Stirner - via FidoNet node 1:125/1 UUCP: ...!uunet!kumr!shelter!0!0!M..Stirner INTERNET: M..Stirner@f0.n0.z1.FIDONET.ORG
Apologies for replying on the list....
Something is way screwy with Penet lately. I have found that I have had passwords required when I had no recollection of installing them. On top of this, I am unable to use the password provision due to header grunging at the UUCP gate, in any case. . I have requested to admin@anon.penet.fi that the accounts by number be deleted in order that I can start over with fresh accounts, & despite three requests, this has not been done. Bloody annoying, but I suppose when we give Julf a big raise, _then_ I can start bitching, huh? 8-)
Here's why. I can't reply directly to your message, as some gateway on the way barfs on the ".." in your name. This seems to come and go. This is probably also what screws up anon.penet.fi.
repl: bad addresses: "M. Stirner" <M..Stirner@f0.n0.z1.fidonet.org> -- no mailbox in local-part (.)
Another problem is that your address keeps changing. Thus you have several ID's on anon.penet.fi, some with passwords, some without. Your message was from m..stirner@f0.n0.z1.fidonet.org, but in your sinature you claim you are also m..stirner@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org (or ...!uunet!kumr!shelter!0!0!M..Stirner). Julf
participants (2)
-
Johan Helsingius
-
M..Stirner@f0.n0.z1.FIDONET.ORG