Re: CDR Anonymizer (fwd)
on Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 04:18:56PM -0500, CDR Anonymizer (cpunks_anon@ssz.com) wrote:
I received the following ...
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 09:54:32 -0700 Subject: CDR Anonymizer
Hi Jim.
Could you hack your CDR Anonymizer script to pass the To: and Cc: lines? Every time someone uses it, I get a bounce from a couple lne CDR subscribers whos MTAs are configured to reject mail with no To: or Cc: line.
Leaving the To: line in won't change the anonymity any, we all know that it's going to the cypherpunks list.
Thanks.
-- Cut Here --
In responce I have modified the ~/cpunks_anon/.procmailrc. Let's see if this doesn't fix the bounces. I'd like to try to keep the header to a minimum (ie no Cc: if we can help it). I also put To: to the anonymizer. I already put a Reply To: that points at the cpunks list.
I'm getting mail w/o a "To" line of: To: cpunks_anon@einstein.ssz.com I'm looking for an effective procmail filtering rule. As I'm subscribed to LNE, I'm currently filtering on: :0: * ^Sender: owner-cypherpunks@lne.com cypherpunks Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 02:35:25PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
I'm getting mail w/o a "To" line of:
To: cpunks_anon@einstein.ssz.com
I'm looking for an effective procmail filtering rule. As I'm subscribed to LNE, I'm currently filtering on:
:0: * ^Sender: owner-cypherpunks@lne.com cypherpunks
I use: * ^From.*owner-cypherpunks@.* which works on all the nodes I've been subscribed to over the last couple years. Eric
Try: :0 * ^Return-Path.*owner-cypherpunks@lne.com cypherpunks On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
I'm getting mail w/o a "To" line of:
To: cpunks_anon@einstein.ssz.com
I'm looking for an effective procmail filtering rule. As I'm subscribed to LNE, I'm currently filtering on:
:0: * ^Sender: owner-cypherpunks@lne.com cypherpunks
Peace.
-- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
[demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
I'm getting mail w/o a "To" line of:
To: cpunks_anon@einstein.ssz.com
I think that is remailer software dependent. I can say that the SSZ CDR doesn't over-write the To: field on resend. lne apparently does. Might talk to the list op and see if they have a strong feel one way or t'other. -- ____________________________________________________________________ The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion. Edmund Burke (1784) The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (4)
-
Eric Murray
-
Jim Choate
-
Karsten M. Self
-
Meyer Wolfsheim