CDR: Re: California bars free speech of those cutting deals ...
California has "shut down"--through a threatening letter--a site which matches up folks who are willing to say theyll vote for Nader in states where Gore is sure to win if other folks who had hoped to
So now it is illegal to provide a public forum with specific capabilities. Is it also illegal for me to privately arrange this with a particular sheeHHHHvoter from the other state ? Gangs can legally call for voters to vote for them and not for the other gang, but voters themselves cannot talk to each other and make arrangements that they see fit. This is the official recognition of the brainwashing monopolies. Time to setup servers in Lybia and Iraq. Too bad their gangs are too stupid to do it themselves. Or maybe I am missing something.
At 2:55 AM +0100 11/1/00, Anonymous Remailer wrote:
California has "shut down"--through a threatening letter--a site which matches up folks who are willing to say theyll vote for Nader in states where Gore is sure to win if other folks who had hoped to
So now it is illegal to provide a public forum with specific capabilities.
Is it also illegal for me to privately arrange this with a particular sheeHHHHvoter from the other state ? Gangs can legally call for voters to vote for them and not for the other gang, but voters themselves cannot talk to each other and make arrangements that they see fit.
Just another nail in the coffin of free speech in America. Perhaps it is best if Nader wins, or, failing that, one of the Gush-Bore tag team. The worse things get, the faster the collapse. --Tim May -- ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 831-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, "Cyphernomicon" | black markets, collapse of governments.
And it isn't even shut down through law - just FUD, letting them create a chilling effect without the need for a full-scale argument in court. At 07:31 PM 10/31/00 -0800, Tim May wrote:
At 2:55 AM +0100 11/1/00, Anonymous Remailer wrote:
California has "shut down"--through a threatening letter--a site which matches up folks who are willing to say theyll vote for Nader in states where Gore is sure to win if other folks who had hoped to
So now it is illegal to provide a public forum with specific capabilities.
Is it also illegal for me to privately arrange this with a particular sheeHHHHvoter from the other state ? Gangs can legally call for voters to vote for them and not for the other gang, but voters themselves cannot talk to each other and make arrangements that they see fit.
Just another nail in the coffin of free speech in America.
Perhaps it is best if Nader wins, or, failing that, one of the Gush-Bore tag team. The worse things get, the faster the collapse.
As with Perot, Nader's certainly no worse than the major parties. Thanks! Bill Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
participants (3)
-
Anonymous Remailer -
Bill Stewart -
Tim May