Re: Senate approves USA Act, sends to Bush, Ashcroft vows "newera"

measl@mfn.org wrote :
Even more disturbing are phrases like - "Investigators focused on function, not form - they focused on doing what was necessary to get the job done rather than what was dictated by the organizational chart." { like judges } "The first principle is airtight surveillance of terrorists." { obviously since we can't a priori know who is a terrorist and who is not we have to watch everyone. } "Communications regarding terrorist offenses such as the use of biological or chemical agents, financing acts of terrorism or materially supporting terrorism will be subject to interception by law enforcement." { sound like domestic echelon/keywords? is simple discussion or browsing enough to grab the attention of the all-seeing eye? } "As soon as possible, law enforcement will begin to employ new tools that ease administrative burdens and delays in apprehending terrorists." { we all know what the main burden is }
J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org
I think an off-site backup of personal or "interesting" material is a good idea. Mike

On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 07:48:44PM -0700, mmotyka@lsil.com wrote:
Put another way, if the Feds seriously believe someone to be a terrorist, for chrissakes, arrest 'em! We've seen that habeas corpus is no deterrent, after all. There may be limited reasons to keep an honest-to-goodness terrorist under surveillance, but the new law won't help there -- the FBI already has the power it needs. -Declan
participants (2)
-
Declan McCullagh
-
mmotyka@lsil.com