Palme revealed by... Karl Rove!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/featuredposts.html#a003556 So, will Shrub still "demand that the person who broke the law in the Plame Case answer for their crime?". Do you even need to ask? 5000 Quatloos that nobody thinks this is (a) impeachment material, or (b) prosecutable since it was done by Rove... -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org 0xBD4A95BF "Never belong to any party, always oppose privileged classes and public plunderers, never lack sympathy with the poor, always remain devoted to the public welfare, never be satisfied with merely printing news, always be drastically independent, never be afraid to attack wrong, whether by predatory plutocracy or predatory poverty." Joseph Pulitzer 1907 Speech
You're mixing up assassinating a president with treason performed for revenge and crude political gain. At 11:56 AM 7/2/2005, J.A. Terranson wrote:
5000 Quatloos that nobody thinks this is (a) impeachment material, or (b) prosecutable since it was done by Rove...
It's only impeachable if Bush knew and couldn't justify his lack of response as executive privilege. I'd assume his handlers have a standing agreement of plausible deniability for that sort of thing. As far as prosecutable goes, it'd sure be fun to watch, unless of course there's another runaway bride or dead puppy or somebody burns a flag on July 4th or the comet blows up real good or whatever else it takes to distract the public for 15 minutes.
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Bill Stewart wrote:
You're mixing up assassinating a president with treason performed for revenge and crude political gain.
No, I'm merely a dyslexic typist Bill :-/ As many years of my posts clearly show :-)
At 11:56 AM 7/2/2005, J.A. Terranson wrote:
5000 Quatloos that nobody thinks this is (a) impeachment material, or (b) prosecutable since it was done by Rove...
It's only impeachable if Bush knew and couldn't justify his lack of response as executive privilege. I'd assume his handlers have a standing agreement of plausible deniability for that sort of thing.
Sure. Just like the last fuckhead in that office, who was nevertheless pursued with zeal and vigor (correctly so IMNSHO).
As far as prosecutable goes, it'd sure be fun to watch, unless of course there's another runaway bride or dead puppy or somebody burns a flag on July 4th or the comet blows up real good or whatever else it takes to distract the public for 15 minutes.
I personally think that O'Conner's resignation will be the distractant. Maybe amplified by a Gonzalez nomination. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org 0xBD4A95BF "Never belong to any party, always oppose privileged classes and public plunderers, never lack sympathy with the poor, always remain devoted to the public welfare, never be satisfied with merely printing news, always be drastically independent, never be afraid to attack wrong, whether by predatory plutocracy or predatory poverty." Joseph Pulitzer 1907 Speech
participants (2)
-
Bill Stewart -
J.A. Terranson