[jrandom@i2p.net: [i2p] weekly status notes [jun 21]]
Speaking of which, are *you* running a Tor node? You should. ----- Forwarded message from jrandom <jrandom@i2p.net> -----
Any idea how much it would cost? How much time is involved? (My constraint is the latter and not so much the former.) -TD
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org> To: cypherpunks@jfet.org Subject: [jrandom@i2p.net: [i2p] weekly status notes [jun 21]] Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:28:21 +0200
Speaking of which, are *you* running a Tor node? You should.
----- Forwarded message from jrandom <jrandom@i2p.net> -----
From: jrandom <jrandom@i2p.net> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:22:28 -0700 To: i2p@i2p.net Subject: [i2p] weekly status notes [jun 21]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi y'all, time to start back up our weekly status notes
* Index 1) Dev[eloper] status 2) Dev[elopment] status 3) Unit test bounty 4) Service outage 5) ???
* 1) Dev[eloper] status
After 4 cities in 4 countries, I'm finally getting settled and churning through code again. Last week I got the last of the pieces to a laptop together, I'm no longer couch hopping, and while I don't have net access at home, there are plenty of net cafes around, so access is reliable (just infrequent and expensive).
That last point means that I won't be hanging out on irc as much as before, at least until the fall (I've got a sublet through August or so and will be looking for a place where I can get 24/7 net access). That doesn't, however, mean that I won't be doing as much - I'll just be working largely on my own test network, pushing out builds for live net testing (and, er, oh yeah, releases). It does mean though that we may want to move some discussions that used to go on free form in #i2p onto the list [1] and/or the forum [2] (I do still read the #i2p backlog though). I haven't found a reasonable place where I can go to for our development meetings yet, so I won't be there this week, but perhaps by next week I'll have found one.
Anyway, enough about me.
[1] http://dev.i2p.net/pipermail/i2p/ [2] http://forum.i2p.net/
* 2) Dev[elopment] status
While I've been moving, there have been two main fronts that I've been working on - documentation and the SSU transport (the later only since I got the laptop). The docs are still in progress, with a big ol' scary overview one as well as a series of smaller implementation docs (covering things like source layout, component interaction, etc).
SSU progress is going well - the new ACK bitfields are in place, the communication is dealing with (simulated) loss effectively, rates are appropriate for the various conditions, and I've cleared some of the uglier bugs I had run into previously. I am continuing to test these changes though, and once its appropriate we'll plot out a series of live net tests for which we'll need some volunteers to help out with. More news on that front when its available.
* 3) Unit test bounty
I'm glad to announce that Comwiz has come forward with a series of patches to claim the first phase of the unit test bounty [3]! We are still working through some minor details of the patches, but I've received the updates and generated both the junit and clover reports as necessary. I expect we'll have the patches in CVS shortly, at which point we'll put out Comwiz's testing docs.
As clover is a commercial product (free for OSS developers [4]), only those who have installed clover and received their clover license will be able to generate the clover reports. In any case, we'll be publishing the clover reports on the web periodically, so those who don't have clover installed can still see how well our test suite is doing.
[3] http://www.i2p.net/bounties_unittest [4] http://www.cenqua.com/clover/
* 4) Service outage
As many have probably noticed, (at least) one of the outproxies is offline (squid.i2p), as is www.i2p, dev.i2p, cvs.i2p, and my blog. These are not unrelated events - the machine hosting them is hosed. I'm working on getting it back up though, at which point those five services will be back in operation. Just an FYI.
* 5) ???
As there isn't a dev meeting on irc this week, if anyone else has anything to bring up, please feel free to post up to the list or the forum. I've been following the discussions on the list, the forum, and in #i2p while I've been away, and have been glad to be able to sit back and let other people answer most of the questions.
I do appreciate the patience people have had with the slow down in releases as well, and realize that in some projects that would be cause for alarm. I2P is not, however, one of those projects - I've been working on it fulltime for more than two years now and will not stop until the needs that have been driving it are met. I am not wed to particular technologies for technologies sake, but merely follow what seems to be the best path from here to where we need to be, and as far as I can tell, we are still following the best path available. This summer, fall, and winter look to be a very exciting time in the anonymity field.
=jr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCuEcEWYfZ3rPnHH0RAvltAJ0fuhd/QRRqICtnqITeljKRw8cbbACeInKx gaRYTsDAU3zHBCxr4TiSl18= =uXj9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ i2p mailing list i2p@i2p.net http://i2p.dnsalias.net/mailman/listinfo/i2p
----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:00:47PM -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
Any idea how much it would cost? How much time is involved? (My constraint is the latter and not so much the former.)
Debian setup is easiest, put deb http://mirror.noreply.org/pub/tor experimental-sarge main into your /etc/apt/sources.list and you can install tor via apt-get update and apt-get install tor You might want to touch /etc/tor/torrc to reflect your exit policies (my colo blocks port 6667), and bandwidth capping (I cap at 80 KB, which leaves me with some 10-15 GBytes traffic/day). ExitPolicy reject 0.0.0.0/8,reject 169.254.0.0/16,reject 127.0.0.0/8, reject 192.168.0.0/16,reject 10.0.0.0/8,reject 172.16.0.0/12 ExitPolicy accept *:20-22,accept *:53,accept *:79-81,accept *:110,accept *:143,accept *:389,accept *:443,accept *:636,accept *:706,accept *:873,accept *:993,accept *:995 ExitPolicy reject *:1214,reject *:4661-4666,reject *:6346-6347,reject *:6419,reject *:6667,reject *:6881-6889 ExitPolicy accept *:1024-65535,reject *:* BandwidthRate 80 KB -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
participants (2)
-
Eugen Leitl
-
Tyler Durden