On 19 Dec 01 Len Sassaman wrote:

(This isn't exact either. Failure, in this case, is pinpointed at the link between two remailers, rather than at a given remailer. If a user queried the bank and discovered that, out of a 5 remailer chain, remailers A, B, and C redeemed the tokens but D did not, this either means C is cheating, C is broken on sending, or D is broken on receiving. Further tests would be necessary to determine the exact nature of the failure.)

Hmmm I have an idea about this. What if remailer C doesn't get to cash in on his tokens unless delivery to remailer D can be confirmed? Or maybe there is some other way to cut down on cheating. Ben Xain bxain@redneck.gacracker.org