I have set up my node to add an extra line to the message headers: X-Toad: This will be added to any lines that contain the toad.com a Received: header line. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Data Security & Cryptology Consulting Programming, Networking, Analysis PGP for OS/2: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html E-Secure: http://www.openpgp.net/esecure.html ---------------------------------------------------------------
In <200009231543.LAA11517@domains.invweb.net>, on 09/23/00 at 09:44 AM, "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@openpgp.net> said:
I have set up my node to add an extra line to the message headers:
X-Toad:
This will be added to any lines that contain the toad.com a Received: header line.
Sorry, I meant to write: This will be added to message headers that have a Received: header line containing "toad.com". -- --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Data Security & Cryptology Consulting Programming, Networking, Analysis PGP for OS/2: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html E-Secure: http://www.openpgp.net/esecure.html ---------------------------------------------------------------
I've been checking headers watching for the X-Toad, but none so far -- not much spam either, but one thing I did notice, that I hadn't seen before, was an extra X-Loop: on some messages with (in just two, there hasn't been much traffic) a cypherpunks@algebra.com and ssz.com. This is in addition to the usual X-Loop: openpgp.net -- and looking back, I don't seen those. Is this a new thing? And, it would seem, that this one does show the origin node? At least in the case of Choate's message it would seem to -- so toad.com should show up here, I'd think, and could be filtered on, or is it going to be an actual X-Toad? Either way, I'm quite happy to see it! Thanx.
In <39CDFC9C.C526A898@harmon.arrowhead.lib.mn.us>, on 09/24/00 at 07:08 AM, Harmon Seaver <hseaver@harmon.arrowhead.lib.mn.us> said:
I've been checking headers watching for the X-Toad, but none so far -- not much spam either, but one thing I did notice, that I hadn't seen before, was an extra X-Loop: on some messages with (in just two, there hasn't been much traffic) a cypherpunks@algebra.com and ssz.com. This is in addition to the usual X-Loop: openpgp.net -- and looking back, I don't seen those. Is this a new thing? And, it would seem, that this one does show the origin node? At least in the case of Choate's message it would seem to -- so toad.com should show up here, I'd think, and could be filtered on, or is it going to be an actual X-Toad?
The X-Loop: has been there. The various nodes add that tag to prevent them from getting into endless loops. I had to make a few tweaks to my cdr script. You should start to see the X-Toad: Yes in the headers of messages set through toad.com. I'll send this reply through toad to verify. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Data Security & Cryptology Consulting Programming, Networking, Analysis PGP for OS/2: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html E-Secure: http://www.openpgp.net/esecure.html ---------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Harmon Seaver
-
William H. Geiger III