"more money than brains?"
Uu> From: cdodhner@indirect.com ("Christian D. Odhner")
Only one question: WHY? If PGP is freeware for noncommercial single users, why on earth would anyone wish to drop $100 +/- for single-user rights to a virtually identical program? The mind boggles. I know that the principal Cypherpunks are rich, but I'm sure they could find more worthy charities than ViaCrypt...like getting me a new modem, for example... ********************************************************************* * <m..stirner@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org> - PGP Key D30909 via servers * * > What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not <* * > warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit <* * > of resistance? Let them take arms!" - Thomas Jefferson, 1787 <* ********************************************************************* ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 -- M. Stirner - via FidoNet node 1:125/1 UUCP: ...!uunet!kumr!shelter!28!M..Stirner INTERNET: M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG
M. Stirner:
There are several business proposals floating around the cypherpunks community that would require commercial licenses. I encourage the various crypto-entrepreneurs elaborate if they wish. Some of the proposals are quite interesting and illuminating. There's a strong habit of keeping business ideas "trade secret", which can be a bad idea, since (a) many of the ideas are obvious; trade secrets only work for subtle but important technological bottlenecks known to a small group of mutually trustworthy people, and (b) many of the ideas need to debugged by a wide variety of crackers and experts before they will provid good privacy. Trade secrets also inhibit the progress of the cypherpunks agenda, but that's a judgement call; I myself dont' feel morally bound to Reveal All for the sake of the Movement. But, "I'll post mine if you post yours". Nick Szabo szabo@netcom.com
M. Stirner:
Well, I've had dealings with a couple of business clients who refuse to use freeware PGP it because of 'the shaky legal ground'. We explained that as a government agency, we can use PGP legally, and because (in each case) the business already had rights to use RSA for their own purposes, there was no problem. They said if they could buy it, that'd make it a lot easier to use. (These same businesses refuse to distribute FSF/GNU code for similarly vague legal reasons.)
participants (3)
-
jet＠netcom.com -
M..Stirner＠f28.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG -
szabo＠netcom.com