(Sorry, Cypherpunks, for the ">" in this message--I made the classic
mistake of sending this message only to Fen, hence this forwarded form.
I'll try to watch this in the future!)
Fen Labalme believes Eric's "penny a hop" is still too expensive, especially
for "the poor":
Geeez, Eric! I'd think a penny a hop would be a pretty high price... And
given that most messages go through two hops, then you'd really be giving
your 2 cents worth!
Note that there can be about 50 cypherpunks messages a day -- if each went
through 2 hops at $0.10 / hop, as you proposed, that would be $10 / day in
revenues for the remailers. Seems like a lot to me.
I would support the idea if I felt that the system would quiet the flame
wars, but I think rather it would simply quiet the poor...
Fen
You don't have to support the idea, Fen, you just have to open your own
remailing node! If you think you can do it more cheaply--perhaps subsidizing
the costs from your other income, or perhaps just doing it as charity--you are
completely free to do so.
The "liquidity" of remailer hops (with the "Mark V" software that handles the
grunge automatically) will be quite interesting to see. Some will go for
minimum cost (one cheap hop), others will route messages through dozens of
hops.
Services will arise which "rate" the quality of remailers, in terms of
pricing, security, latency, message sizes accepted, past experiences, etc.
Bandwidths are increasing so rapidly and computer hardware is getting so
cheap, that I doubt even the poorest of the poor, in the U.S. at least, will
be unable to send these kinds of messages. The costs of transmission are just
so trivial compared to other costs that even poor people routinely pay.
(Whether the poor and downtrodden will _want_ to participate in this Brave New
World is another matter. My guess is they will.)
-Tim