Jealousy is the lifeblood of ambition, Assange is a victim, and who is not? Sorry to say Brian, for you customarily offer unusually trenchant commentary, your comments indicate a lack of awareness of the diverse and multiple forums which offer material similar, and in many cases superior, to that of Wikileaks -- offered long before as well as after its inititation. The leaks conceit of Wikileaks is deliberate, better known as "breaking news," attention getting, the Wiki as false as democracy, the promise of openness never fulfilled due to security needs of the sponsor. What is unique about Wikileaks is its publicity capability and for that it deserves credit to bring to a non-institutional initiative, thanks to the momentarily cheap Internet megaphone, the slick braggardy well known as the key element for the "reputation, responsibility and trustworthyiness" of big institutions from their origin millennia ago. Promoting established institutions is what the media -- journalism, publishing, entertainment, advertising -- were invented to do by creating the illusion that individuals have a say in "what's going on." But never invited into the sanctums where decisions are made about the means and methods for promulgating illusions. All this has been said tiresomely (arch ouch) overmuch. So what else is new about Wikileaks type initiatives that the hullabaloo can advance? One is to contain enthusiasm, if you will, about the uniquenss of Wikileaks. It is not unique in the content it provides: there is much more and better available by less celebrated means and methods, once called research, reflection and reassement, continually done, even non-institutionally, perhaps that most so, not reduced to crowd-arousing bombshells in which the tiniest of comment is viralized to thousands of sites -- try it: post anything with the word Wikileaks in its title and watch it richochet in synapases of worldbrain. To advance the much larger body of material it would be useful to develop a battery of such socio-political-rich words which would assure attention to an inititiative that might be otherwise swamped by orchestrated viralization, ie, advertising. "Che" once did that, as do "Obama" and "Assange" now, albeit somewhat smeared by assholes unable to dream of less than godlike perfection. Your point about jealous of other blogs has become a knee-jerker that shows ignorance, well, lack of appreciation, of other initiatives which have not been catapulted to the media stage where nearly every commentator derives daily doses of inspiration to get off ass and be "a player." Which means worthy of paying attention to. How to get from being a non-entity to being a player is what Assange has demonstrated. Not enough attention has been paid to how he imagined Wikileaks for that, although a lot of superficial reporting has been done on the person and personality of Assange. Assange is more complicated and inscrutable than he has been caricatured to be -- ie, mediaized. But then so are all heroes manufactured in that mold and buried in that sarcophagus. Agreed that much better analysis is needed for those who yearn for that comfort food never available on blogs and the daily beasts. Better than analysis though is to do more of what Wikileaks does to get forbidden information into public hands, minds and hearts, unanalyzed, and most crucially unmediated. That might mean fighting the mediaized Internet addiction, say, for a day or two a week, gradually assemble your own material and formulate its significance -- and do not rush to post the drivel, ponder, reassemble, exchange it quietly, redo, rejigger, reflect, sit on it. Arguing about fucking Wikileaks has led me to write more bombast in the past six months than in the previous 14 years, as you can readily see, and curtailed research and publication of unanalyzed materials. The issue is infectious and induces Mailer's advertisements for himself. The Wikileaks initiative is now in grave danger of being destroyed by the attention Assange yearned for and assumed would be easy to handle. He is its Achilles heel. Not the first time that has happened, again merely look at the over-celebrated who are over-loaded with our cowardly aspirations that they do for us what we are too lazy or inept to do for ourselves, everready to blame the socio-political gods that failed, everready to vote in Time's Persons of the Year proffered by manipulative authoritatives. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE