(George A. Gleason)
1) Anything involving physical violence, threats of violence, incitement to violence. (this includes acts such as rape, pedophelia etc.,
Don't forget that this also includes government. I for one would favor banning the advocacy of government from the nets. Serve them right <G>. Interesting that most people support murder, robbery, and slavery when practiced in the name of the State but might shirk from supporting rape in the service of the State. Sounds inconsistent to me. Duncan Frissell
Tiia Roth-Biester <72147.3504@CompuServe.COM> writes:
(George A. Gleason)
1) Anything involving physical violence, threats of violence, incitement to violence. (this includes acts such as rape, pedophelia etc.,
Don't forget that this also includes government. I for one would favor banning the advocacy of government from the nets. Serve them right <G>. Interesting that most people support murder, robbery, and slavery when practiced in the name of the State but might shirk from supporting rape in the service of the State. Sounds inconsistent to me.
Not really. Since its foundation, the cornerstone of government is that it maintains the only legitimate monopoly on the use of violence. Like it or not, this is how it works and most of the sheep/citizens are quite happy to maintain this system. It is kind of ironic that you would propose to ban the advocacy of government on the nets considering the fact that without governement the nets would not be here in the first place. Sounds inconsistent to me... jim
participants (2)
-
mccoy@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
-
Tiia Roth-Biester