Not the messages signed by the purchaser of the Nym, as those would not be signed with the Nym's signature. ----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--------------------------- + ^ + :Surveillance cameras|Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\ \|/ :aren't security. A |share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\ <--*-->:camera won't stop a |monitor, or under your keyboard, you \/|\/ /|\ :masked killer, but |don't email them, or put them on a web \|/ + v + :will violate privacy|site, and you must change them very often. --------_sunder_@_sunder_._net_------- http://www.sunder.net ------------ On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:

On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Sunder wrote:

...

Following which the buyer posts all the signed emails between self and seller detailing the fraudulent transaction.

Worthless, as all of those messages could have been forged. Or did you mean to say that they had been dated by a third party timestamping service?

The fact is, digital signatures are irrelevant if private keys can be compromised.

-MW-