At 08:35 PM 9/9/2002 +0100, Peter Fairbrother <zenadsl6186@zen.co.uk> wrote:

I think it's actually quite reasonable: below is the proposed new list, and except for malicious reasons I can't think why anyone would want to use them outside a fully-equipped lab (with an on-site medical presence etc). Anyone who does is showing negligent disregard for human safety. And his own.

Peter, After reviewing the list I don't deny the dangers inherent in experimenting with these items. My objection has to do with the federal government's involvement. Over the past ten years I've made it a "hobby" to study the detailed legislative histories of several key constitutional amendments (e.g., the 14th and 16th) and Supreme Court rulings on these amendments and their interpretations of the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clauses. I've read the works of and discussed the findings with a number of Constitutional scholars (e.g., Larry Lessig and Eugene Volokh). In general they support my conclusions and share a serious concern for the frightening lack of respect Congress and the Supreme Court have shown the Constitution and our liberties. If I am right substantial portions of federal law passed since the Civil War (and especially since the FDR administration) have no basis in a clear reading of the Constitution. I have no qualms with my state regulating many of my behaviors and possessions, but find the federal involvement unlawful and unacceptable in this area. Most of my fellow citizens accept an almost unlimited federal involvement in our daily lives. The Founders placed many safeguards in the Constitution to prevent this, but Congress and the Courts have found illegal circumventions. Most Americans would rather not know that their liberties have been and are continuing to be drained away by the unconstitutional practices of the supposed guardians of their liberties. They believe that the current balance struck is the best under the circumstances. In fact, they are frightened by (or consider mentally unbalanced or unpatriotic) anyone who would raise serious objections. I am left to protect my rights the best I can, even if it means violating unlawful regulations. If you are one of the "many" you will probably find my ranting that of a loon. If not, a good place to start your inquiry is with the recently published book, "The Real Lincoln," by Thomas diLorenzo http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0761536418/lewrockwell/104-1710778-13.... Its causing quite a stir in American historical circles. http://www.washtimes.com/civilwar/20020504-87400616.htm http://www.lewrockwell.com/dieteman/dieteman115.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo14.html steve