In another message Tim wrote:
On Sunday, August 26, 2001, at 12:11 AM, Reese wrote:
It's easy to stay on topic, or on a topic, it's another thing to be appropriate. Tim is good, but easy improvement is within reach, as you sort of noted.
Fuck off. I'll take constructive criticism from people who are better writers than I, or at least in the same ballpark.
But not from those who have left no lasting impression.
I'm not sure if Reese was replying to one of my messages, but this obsession less productive posters have with Tim is peculiar. Looked at as an engineering problem, one tends to look at the underperforming components. Let's say you are running a steel mill, and the average uptime of your blast furnaces is 10%. One is 95%. Nobody would spend their time trying to get the last 5% out of the best furnace. Anybody would look at it and figure out how to get the other furnaces performing. So, some other force is at work. One candidate is the usual tedious resentment that some people feel towards people they see as smarter, more knowledgeable, and more creative than themselves. This sort of behavior is deeply repugnant to me, much more so than occasional political incorrectness. Another candidate is that certain people see Tim as somehow their leader (or something), therefore making him accountable in some way. Given that Tim is not anybody's leader and doesn't seem to want to be, this is less repugnant than it is ridiculous.
At 15:33 8/30/2001 -0700, A. Melon wrote:
In another message Tim wrote:
On Sunday, August 26, 2001, at 12:11 AM, Reese wrote:
It's easy to stay on topic, or on a topic, it's another thing to be appropriate. Tim is good, but easy improvement is within reach, as you sort of noted.
Fuck off. I'll take constructive criticism from people who are better writers than I, or at least in the same ballpark.
But not from those who have left no lasting impression.
I'm not sure if Reese was replying to one of my messages, but this obsession less productive posters have with Tim is peculiar.
Even more peculiar, the wrong turns taken when responding to an out- of-context quote.
Looked at as an engineering problem, one tends to look at the underperforming components.
Why look at a utilization issue as an engineering problem? Unless the object is to fit the square peg to the round hole. Behold my post in its entirety: At 18:47 8/25/2001 -0500, Anonymous wrote: >I'm not too delighted with the "I have friends who want to kill >all Jews" type of remarks, but beggars can't be choosers. > >People carp about Tim, but I'd like to see anybody try to do one >Tim May quality post every day for two weeks. Including the "I have friends who want to kill all the Jews" type of remarks? GIGO, yada. It's easy to stay on topic, or on a topic, it's another thing to be appropriate. Tim is good, but easy improvement is within reach, as you sort of noted. Perhaps it was Anonymous you should've referred to, instead of me. Reese
"A. Melon" wrote: [...]
I'm not sure if Reese was replying to one of my messages, but this obsession less productive posters have with Tim is peculiar.
Looked at as an engineering problem, one tends to look at the underperforming components. Let's say you are running a steel mill, and the average uptime of your blast furnaces is 10%. One is 95%. Nobody would spend their time trying to get the last 5% out of the best furnace. Anybody would look at it and figure out how to get the other furnaces performing.
[...] Which just goes to show that neither politics nor software are branches of engineering. If I was an Evil Exploitative Record Label and one artist was selling at ten times the rate of the other I'd put most of my marketing budget behind the hits. If I was a publisher of fantasy fiction and I had Joanne Rowling or Terry Pratchett on my list, and I was interested in nothing but making lots of money, I'd push them rather than, say, John Crowley or Tom Holt (two of my favourite writers). If I was managing a software development shop and one programmer was producing better code faster than the others, I'd give them more jobs, not less. If I was interested in reading political comment I'd read the writer who made most sense last time, not the ten who didn't. Part of all this is rent. Part of it is that some people really are much better at this stuff than others. Part of it is the mythical man-month. And part of it is that some folk still just don't get it. I make no comment about who gets it and who doesn't. Except that I deleted around 100 postings unread this morning & most of them came from entities claiming names starting with "J". Ken
participants (3)
-
A. Melon -
Ken Brown -
Reese