Thread Index for the period of 2001.12.17-2001.12.23 Near top-CNN on remailers-

...

...This does not invalidate my point - that such special treatment could lead a remop into legal problems. We have two different problems, with mutually undesirable solutions. Peter Trei ubject: CDR: RE: CNN.com on Remailers From: "Trei, Peter" <ptrei@rsasecurity.com> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:23:43 -0500 ...Typical Choate, missing the point. same thread-another post.same poster.

...

...In fact, spammers currently *do* send mail encrypted to the remailers' keys. It's a pain in the ass trying to filter the damn stuff out.

Ben Xain bxain@redneck.gacracker.org

First I've heard that. Frankly, I'm suprised. One solution, which I've long advocated, is for the remailer to drop mail which has an unencrypted body after it's applied it's decryption key. Provided this is an announced policy, substantially increases the protection of the mail and the remop. It does mean that only people capable of using encryption can receive mail via the remailer, but that's probably a *good* thing. Peter Trei<< So,peter's here,he's contributing and not concealing corporate vested interests,so far so good. Few posts down

...

CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, Anonymous CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, John Young CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, Greg Newby CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, Bill Stewart CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, D.Popkin CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, Luthor Blisset CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, John Young Re: CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, measl <Possible follow-up(s)> CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, Major Variola \(ret\) CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, Nomen Nescio CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, Petro CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, Faustine Re: CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, measl CDR: Re: Cypherpunk Ban, Anonymous User.<<

...

If there's anything more annoying than a boring nut who takes up 30% of the list volume, it's a boring nut who takes up 30% of the list volume with plaigerized articles from other, much more creative and intelligent nuts. This, of course, is -named recently

Peter Trei may be "anonymouse" or Pseudynomous in this thread...or he slept through it,doesnt care,domestic/business emergency,other distraction,any number of excuses.Nowt wrong with that but then next week... persecuted list member- work, as published on Declan's Politech list. Peter Trei<< The mask slips,30% of the list appears to be one spam,(20/20) Did Trei complain about that? He absolutely endangered a comrades peace and security with his inattention/carelessnes/maliciousness.Take your pick in the absence of an explanation.He has ducked questions on this while bragging about his rapacious capitalist connections and now has the gall to try and sell conference tickets here like the lowest cheap spam.Fuck the rsa company and double fuck its low running dog,Peter Trei.