----------

Ralf-Philipp Weinmann[SMTP:weinmann@rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de] wrote: On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Sampo A Syreeni wrote:

...

On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, David Honig wrote: One variation of the original proposal would be to only allow egress to addresses known to lay in a jurisdiction different from the one in which the remailer resides. I know, the problem is nontrivial with all the dotcom addresses and such around. Does doing a DNS lookup and working on IP addresses help? [...] What one could do however is have the remailer pass on every message which has a recipient address that is *known to be in a jurisdiction that is different from the remailers*. You will not be able to reach each and every target then, but at least it's better than nothing. On the other hand I remember that the Curch of Scientology was able to have an impact on anon.penet.fi despite the fact that this remailer was outside of US jurisdiction. Maybe we have to come up with a list of "incompatible" jurisdiction systems to avoid this sort of thing from happening again.

Cheers, -Ralf

So when is the HavenCo remailer going up? Peter Trei