[jstyre@jstyre.com: Re: Salon article on AT&T network monitoring]
----- Forwarded message from "James S. Tyre" <jstyre@jstyre.com> -----
A fair amount of the redactions of the Scott Marcus declaration can be restored by using the various Klein statements, releases and declarations, the ATT filing which had liftable redactions, Wired's releases, and the recent Salon article. For example, Coderman guessed here a 3-letter redaction could be "tap," while it is actually "SG3," the acronym for "Study Group 3." This is disclosed in the ATT filing which had a liftable redaction referring to a redacted sentence in the Marcus declaration. "Study Group 3" is also one of the common redactions in the Marcus doc. We're restoring others and will share or put on Cryptome. Help welcomed.
On 6/26/06, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
A fair amount of the redactions of the Scott Marcus declaration can be restored by using the various Klein statements, releases and declarations, the ATT filing which had liftable redactions, Wired's releases, and the recent Salon article.
For example, Coderman guessed here a 3-letter redaction could be "tap," while it is actually "SG3," the acronym for "Study Group 3."
doh, mea culpa (i realized this later yesterday when trying to correlate the titles of redacted exhibits with the names of the exhibits that were relased previously...)
... We're restoring others and will share or put on Cryptome. Help welcomed.
what kind of help would be useful (sending in one-off edits as discovered, or is there a group collaborating elsewhere)? is there a running archive of all the relevant docs / articles or at least pointers to them? (to appease the copyright cartels)
participants (3)
-
coderman -
Eugen Leitl -
John Young