Peter Trei sent >>mattd is still a newbie to this list. He will eventually learn that the title of the list: 'cypherpunks' tells nothing about the views of list subscribers, which range widely. In particular, he will learn that participation in the list does not imply acceptance of any particular stance, attitude, or agenda towards crypto, stego, or government or lack thereof. The only thing which can really be said about subscribers in general is that they think crypto is worth discussing.

Your fellow PUNK for ANARCHY,mattd. >

You are not my fellow. I am not a punk. Since no one here even agrees what anarchy is, it's incorrect for you to assume that anyone agrees on that, either. Peter Trei << Im a newbie to a list titled cypherpunks,not cyphershills,cypherprats,cyphergoons,cyphersucks,cypherfeds,etc,etc. Punk does imply something whatever you say.To accept lies,propaganda and self delusional CALC,would be fatal for this list.The natural selection of good ideas will sort this all out,let the rivers flow red. You are not my fellow now;So?.Not that I want you for my fellow or asked you,I was talking to declan,there still may be hope for him.I also dont just write for those neutral,balanced,objective,scientific,cleareyed,lucid,rational pragmatists such as your good self.I have to account for the foul,creepy vermin of so called law enforcement and possible data miners from the year 2010.ie.Posterity. If crypto-anarchy is as big as I think its going to be this list will be hirstorically significant.