Re: Speaking of Reason
In a message dated 12/11/2003 10:04:04 AM Eastern Standard Time, declan@well.com writes:
If that is true, why can't it simply be called "capitalist?"
I suspect because actual capitalists would have some problems with it.
Sterling makes a comment betraying what Ludwig Von Mises called the anti-capitalist mentality when he quipped to Godwin: "Sure, we hate Exxon because they're huge and they're everywhere." Sterling is a capitalist in the same way that Brin is a libertarian. I think what it is, both are uncomfortable with really labeling what their true ideology is and therefore feel some need to candy coat their statism. Regards, Matt Gaylor-
At 12:07 PM -0500 12/11/03, Freematt357@aol.com wrote:
Sterling is a capitalist in the same way that Brin is a libertarian.
Better be careful when you say that, or Brin'll fire up his screaming monkey routine at you...
therefore feel some need to candy coat their statism.
Say 'amen', somebody... Cheers, RAH -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah@ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
Freematt357@aol.com wrote: [...]
Sterling makes a comment betraying what Ludwig Von Mises called the anti-capitalist mentality when he quipped to Godwin: "Sure, we hate Exxon because they're huge and they're everywhere."
He was pointing it out, not preaching it. I think over in Austin they do self-deprecrating humour, just like us English do.
Sterling is a capitalist in the same way that Brin is a libertarian. I think what it is, both are uncomfortable with really labeling what their true ideology is and therefore feel some need to candy coat their statism.
I think - but I don't know - that Bruce is a lefty, but not a statist. Anyway the real relevance of the viridian list to the cypherpunks list is that it is about technical fixes to apparently political problems. It's saying something like: "so you think cars (or fridges, or office buildings, or polyester pants) are destroying the world? Don't vote to ban them - all that will happen then is that only the rich (or the government, opr the military) get to own them. Instead design and build and sell better cars, kinder gentler fridges, healthier buildings, cleaner pants, whatever. And these days, cooler, stylish, and more fun, is part of what "better" means". (my paraphrasody of what I see Bruce's point as)
At 2:58 PM +0000 12/12/03, ken wrote:
Bruce is a lefty, but not a statist
riiiighhht... That's like saying that he's a sow, but not a boar... :-) Cheers, RAH -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah@ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
participants (3)
-
Freematt357@aol.com
-
ken
-
R. A. Hettinga