In message <9211251705.AA17774@soda.berkeley.edu> you write:
It is also my suspicion that simple PGP decryption support is fairly straightforward, being mostly the ability to run a command on a block and replace the block with the output of the pipe.
I'd like to chip in here, in my _very_ newbie way, that not everybody is running a unix system with the ability to pipe things between processes in so facile a manner. I access the net through a dial up from a MS-Dos machine running KA9Q software. My PGP is of the stand alone sort. I cannot easily get a new mailer to run on this system. Whatever protocol is decided upon, it would be useful if it were not too host-system specific. [FX Crawls back under stone] Tony ------------------+-------------------------------+--------------------------+ | Tony Kidson |`morgan' is an 8MB 486/33 Cat-| Voice +44 81 466 5127 | | Morgan Towers, |Warmer with a 670 MB Hard Disk.| E-Mail | | Morgan Road, |It resides at Morgan Towers in| tony@morgan.demon.co.uk | | Bromley, |Beautiful Down Town Bromley. | tny@cix.compulink.co.uk | | England BR1 3QE | -=<*>=- | 100024.301@compuserve.com| +=================+===============================+==========================+
Tony writes:
I access the net through a dial up from a MS-Dos machine running KA9Q software. My PGP is of the stand alone sort.
I myself read my own mail on an MSDOS machine acting as a terminal over a dialin. The unix host is not overly secure, and I'm not about to go putting keys on it. I've been thinking about how to solve my own encryption problem, you can be sure. But most of the people on the list are reading mail on Unix machines, and a simple piping interface is the first thing to implement. I myself may not use it at first, but it is a start. Eric
participants (2)
-
Eric Hughes -
tony＠morgan.demon.co.uk