...

Note that there is nothing in nature which implies that force and desire will be mitigated in and of themselves (so much for CACL philosophy).

Not even APster? The mount everest of CALC philosophy?

...

In fact, if one looks at game theory it becomes abundently clear, even given the utility of game theoretic concepts, that the best strategy is not to play by the rules given a choice (this helps explain why non-sentient biological activity conforms to game theory in many cases).<<

...

This of course destroys any concept of 'utopia' where everyone plays by

Evolution in a nutshell,brilliant jim,now as you live near millions of people who don't believe in evolution,would you please stop preaching to the choir and take your show on the road. the same rules all the time without exception.<< These concepts are hereby outlawed.No one will speak of the lifestyles of pre-european polynesia,Arawak,aboriginal and west coast tribespeoples ever again.Should they do so they will be fed to vicious shoats.To begin to think is to begin to be undermined.Im worried about you jim,If the above," What is a 'right'?,"screed was your work,I suggest you read some of RD Laings "Knots".You seem trapped in a bind of some kind.Try challomile and even valerian teas as you read.Go up a hightower somewhere with a highpowered book or two.Thinking of you.