Re: eWe Won't Have CJ Parker and Richard NIxon To Kick Around AnyMore...
From: Steve Furlong <sfurlong@acmenet.net> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- sonofgomez709 wrote:
So, the GoodNews is that I can probably avoid being sent back to the BOP to be Tortured4BeingDisAbled simply by ShuttingTheFuckUp! The BadNews, OfCourseOfCourse [TM], is that I have thus far proved incapable of doing so,
I can't sympathise much on this basis. A family member, a retired cop and the family shame, confirmed what I had suspected: that most people in jail are there because they couldn't keep their mouths shut --- on the street, in the police station, in court. And many who are denied parole or who have it revoked couldn't keep their mouths shut in jail. To tell the truth, I don't think Ralph Waldo Emerson, Martin Luther King, etal, were particularly concerned about receiving sympathy. Even if you couldn't shut up, why didn't you use an anonymizer? You have a characteristic writing style, but there are other rambling, obscure writers on c-punks and the writing couldn't be positively linked to you. Or, better yet, you could learn to write in a conventional, straightforward, clear style and have complete deniability. My parole conditions prevent me from using anonymizers or anonymous remailers. Besides, I had complete deniability at the time of my original conviction, but it didn't matter, because I was denied the right to defend myself or interfere with the government's attorney conceding my guilt. CJ Parker <sonofgomez709@yahoo.com> http://profiles.yahoo.com/sonofgomez709 http://www.technopagan.org/politics/xenix/ http://members.w-link.net/~sog/INDEX.HTM http://jya.com/cejfiles.htm
sonofgomez709 wrote:
My parole conditions prevent me from using anonymizers or anonymous remailers.
Ah. That would do it. Could you finesse the condition by having someone sit at your computer and type as you dictated? _He_ wouldn't be bound by your parole conditions. Or could you send private email to a friend who would then relay it to an anonymizer web? (Or straight to the list, for that matter.) Of course, (I'd say "OfCourseOfCourse", but that's trademarked. <grin>) those methods wouldn't do any good if your release conditions require that you keep a copy of _everything_ you send out. Also, of course, you'd have to have one writing style for messages Big Brother could associate with you and another for your anonymous messages. -- Steve Furlong Computer Condottiere Have GNU, Will Travel 617-670-3793 "Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly while bad people will find a way around the laws." -- Plato
participants (2)
-
sonofgomez709
-
Steve Furlong