--- begin forwarded text
Delivered-To: clips@philodox.com
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:15:39 -0500
To: Philodox Clips List
From: "R. A. Hettinga"
Subject: [Clips] Stew Baker: *I* didn't approve Ports Bill...
Reply-To: rah@philodox.com
Sender: clips-bounces@philodox.com
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PORTS_SECURITY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-02-25-10-37-13
Feb 25, 1:20 PM EST
Homeland Security Objected to Ports Deal
By TED BRIDIS
Associated Press Writer
AP Photo/JOSEPH KACZMAREK
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Homeland Security Department objected at first to a
United Arab Emirates company's taking over significant operations at six
U.S. ports. It was the lone protest among members of the government
committee that eventually approved the deal without dissent.
The department's early objections were settled later in the government's
review of the $6.8 billion deal after Dubai-owned DP World agreed to a
series of security restrictions.
The company indefinitely has postponed its takeover to give President Bush
time to convince Congress that the deal does not pose any increased risks
to the U.S. from terrorism.
Some lawmakers have pressed for a new and intensive review. Despite
persistent criticism from Republicans and Democrats, the president has
defended his administration's approval of the ports deal and threatened to
veto any measures in Congress that would block it. Hearings are to continue
this week.
A DP World executive said the company would agree to tougher security
restrictions to win congressional support only if the same restrictions
applied to all U.S. port operators. The company earlier had struck a more
conciliatory stance, saying it would do whatever Bush asked to salvage the
agreement.
"Security is everybody's business," senior vice president Michael Moore
told The Associated Press. "We're going to have a very open mind to
legitimate concerns. But anything we can do, any way to improve security,
should apply to everybody equally."
The administration approved the ports deal on Jan. 17 after DP World agreed
during secret negotiations to cooperate with law enforcement investigations
in the future and make other concessions.
Some lawmakers have challenged the adequacy of a classified intelligence
assessment crucial to assuring the administration that the deal was proper.
The report was assembled during four weeks in November by analysts working
for the director of national intelligence.
The report concluded that U.S. spy agencies were "unable to locate any
derogatory information on the company," according to a person familiar with
the document. This person spoke only on condition of anonymity because the
report was classified.
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and others have complained that the intelligence
report focused only on information the agencies collected about DP World
and did not examine reported links between UAE government officials and
al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden before the Sept. 11 attacks.
The uproar over DP World has exposed how the government routinely approves
deals involving national security without the input of senior
administration officials or Congress.
President Bush, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, Defense
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and even Treasury Secretary John Snow, who
oversees the government committee that approved the deal, all say they did
not know about the purchase until after it was finalized. The work was done
mostly by assistant secretaries.
Snow now says he may consider changes in the approval process so lawmakers
are better alerted after such deals get the go-ahead.
Stewart Baker, a senior Homeland Security official, said he was the sole
representative on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
who objected to the ports deal. Baker said he later changed his vote after
DP World agreed to the security conditions. Other officials confirmed
Baker's account.
"We were not prepared to sign off on the deal without the successful
negotiation of the assurances," Baker told the AP.
Officials from the White House, CIA, departments of State, Treasury,
Justices, and others looked for guidance from Homeland Security because it
is responsible for seaports. "We had the most obvious stake in the
process," Baker said.
Baker acknowledged that a government audit of security practices at the
U.S. ports in the takeover has not been completed as part of the deal. "We
had the authority to do an audit earlier," Baker said.
The audit will help evaluate DP World's security programs to stop smuggling
and detect illegal shipments of nuclear materials at its seaport operations
in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.
The administration privately disclosed the status of the security audit to
senators during meetings about improving reviews of future business deals
involving foreign buyers. Officials did not suggest the audit's earlier
completion would have affected the deal's approval.
New Jersey's Democratic governor, who is suing to block the deal, said in
his party's weekly radio address on Saturday that the administration failed
to properly investigate the UAE's record on terrorism.
"We were told that the president didn't know about the sale until after it
was approved. For many Americans, regardless of party, this lack of
disciplined review is unacceptable," Jon Corzine said.
Bush's national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, said there was no going
back on the deal.
--
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
_______________________________________________
Clips mailing list
Clips@philodox.com
http://www.philodox.com/mailman/listinfo/clips
--- end forwarded text
--
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'