Americans like killing, but hate being killed
What's funny is how fast this would change if we were just to get a few more bodybags back... http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/12/15/ret.assassination.poll/index.html (CNN) -- A majority of Americans support giving government agents the power to assassinate terrorists despite a U.S. policy forbidding such actions, according to a Newsweek poll released Saturday. In addition, more than three-quarters of 1,003 people surveyed -- 78 percent -- said they favored using military force against Saddam Hussein's forces in Iraq, with 75 percent supporting operations against terrorist targets in other Middle Eastern nations and 66 percent backing those in countries outside the region. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place... --------------------------------------------------------------------
The Portuguese newspaper Expresso, in reporting yesterday on various documents discovered in Kandahar (including a plan to Daisy Cutter London) says there was a manual for PGP. The paper commented that Congress had tried to ban PGP because it might be used by terrorists. Wonder if there are publics keys in the registries for AF? Better, will Zimmermann at long last face a tribunal for perfidy?
Got a URL? didn't see anything here: http://www.expresso.pt/pesquisa/default.asp -Declan On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 10:16:53PM -0800, John Young wrote:
The Portuguese newspaper Expresso, in reporting yesterday on various documents discovered in Kandahar (including a plan to Daisy Cutter London) says there was a manual for PGP.
The paper commented that Congress had tried to ban PGP because it might be used by terrorists.
Wonder if there are publics keys in the registries for AF?
Better, will Zimmermann at long last face a tribunal for perfidy?
Sure, and the URLs still work. The first URL opens the story and the PGP doc is mentioned at the jump at the 2nd URL: http://semanal.expresso.pt/primeira/artigos/interior.asp?edicao=1520&id_arti go=ES45175 http://semanal.expresso.pt/internacional/artigos/interior.asp?edicao=1520&id _artigo=ES45132 Here's Babelfish translation of the passage: To the side of some techniques of combat, apparently rudimentary, were possible to find a manual on one of the techniques of criptagem of more advanced electrsnicas communications of the world, Pretty Good Privacy (PGP). This method, practically considered inviolable, was forbidden by the Congress them United States for distrust that could be used to hide activities terrorist.
participants (3)
-
Declan McCullagh
-
John Young
-
measl@mfn.org