I wasn't actually expecting anonymity. I wrote directly to RAH, asking him politely to edit down his posts, and simply post a few lines and a pointer. Not pointing out his faults in public was simply good manners. His response boils down to 'fuck you'. Cypherpunks has a very loose charter, but it is not the 'everything and anything RAH thinks is neat' list. Peter

Someone wrote:

...

At 10:23 AM -0500 12/21/04, Somebody wrote:

RAH, if you want to anonymize a quoted email, it helps if you remove the In-Reply-To: and References: headers.

...

...

What the hell does an article about gypsy mechanics have to do with cypherpunks?

I plead anarchic markets, m'lord. Emerging phenomena, and all that, in spite all regulation to the contrary.