
In a message dated 3/30/04 9:54:40 PM, mv@cdc.gov writes:
also that Nevada case pending in the Supremes *may* mean that you must present papers. There was also a decision last year IIRC that said that car *passengers* had to show ID if asked. Not drivers, passengers.
If you're not the driver and you don't drive you don't have to have an ID. And you can't show what you don't have. In general this is a bad idea however, as it makes you more suspicious to the police. I'm afraid we've entered a new era of police state fascism, and it might be better to appear to be someone else than the fire breathing Sons of Liberty we imagine we are. Regards, Freematt-

Freematt357@aol.com wrote:
If you're not the driver and you don't drive you don't have to have an ID. And you can't show what you don't have. IIRC, in the case above the guy was outside his car - his daughter (still in the car) may well have been the driver, not him....
participants (2)
-
Dave Howe
-
Freematt357@aol.com