Okay, here are my sound bytes: 1. The long one (needed when they try to outlaw encryption): As we move into the electronic frontier, the freedom to use crypto-privacy technology is becoming the equivalent to the right to bear arms: it is the last line of defense against a tyrannic government. The good news is that privacy is a defensive technology, not an offensive one. Giving up this un-enumerated right could be disasterous to future generations. 2. The short one (simple-minded Clipper is no good): Crypto Privacy is like a bullet proof vest for your transmitted speech; the Clipper chip is a paper jacket with extra zippers in the back. Paul E. Baclace peb@procase.com
Neither of those is aimed at Joe Average Citizen. The first isn't any good, because most people don't see any need to protect against a tyranny. The second is no good because although people might be afraid of getting shot, most people don't go around wearing bulletproof vests all the time. I'd be for something applicable and simple like "Giving the government keys to your encrypted messages is like giving them keys to the front door of your house." People can relate to that. Marc
participants (2)
-
Marc Horowitz
-
peb@PROCASE.COM