* Reply to msg originally in CYPHERPUNKS Uu> The problem may be the Fidonet addressing. Many times I have tried to Uu> send mail to people with mailing addresses like M's, and not had the Uu> mail get through. I don't know what the rules are but perhaps some Uu> systems can get it and some can't. Note that _this_ message goes through an RBBS/UUCP gate. The problem remains, however. On the other hand, I just noted a sheepish message about the remailer@rebma.mn.org being ill for the past couple of weeks, which would explain my failures with that system. Uu> I'd suggest to M. that he take one of the systems that does respond to Uu> his remailing requests, and have that be the LAST one in a chain of Uu> two. So, he could send to, say, hh@cicada.berkeley.edu, and follow Uu> that with elee7h5@rosebud.ee.uh.edu. Perhaps this would get through: An interesting experiment I shall try today, perhaps with this very message. Thank's, Hal, for the input. I should like to see these remailers popularized, along with encryption, as one of the best political moves we cypherpunks can make. De-glitching them for broader use may be a thankless task, but would be worth it if it results in their general use. Uu> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- P.S.: Have you heard anything of the alleged bug with version 2.3 being unable to verify plaintext PGP signatures? ********************************************************************* * <m..stirner@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org> - PGP Key D30909 via servers * * > What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not <* * > warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit <* * > of resistance? Let them take arms!" - Thomas Jefferson, 1787 <* ********************************************************************* ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 -- M. Stirner - via RBBS-NET node 8:914/201 INTERNET: M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.RBBS-NET.ORG