* Reply to msg originally in CYPHERPUNKS

Uu> My apologies to anyone who has tried to use the anonymous remailer at Uu> rebma.mn.org in the past several weeks.

Uu> I imagine that people who weren't successful were Uu> experimenters who chalked up the failure to something they'd done Uu> wrong.

I did, indeed!

Uu> It's working again, now.

Uu> Here's the PGP key.

Does this remailer _require_ an encrypted header, or will it take the | | :: | Request-Remailing-To: | plaintext command?

From dmandl@lehman.com:

It is indeed working OK now. Encryption is not required. Good to see this remailer back up, especially because it introduces a long delay, making traffic analysis more difficult. FYI, sending a message to myself (in NYC) through this remailer, it took about 15 hours for it to come back. This is either very good or very bad depending on your purposes. Bad for urgent messages, good for more...er...sensitive applications. --Dave.